During recent debris burning Trials in the NWT, the WFORG took the opportunity to collect heat flux data as well as make visual observations of the burning debris piles. Our objective was to collect physical data of the heat flux created by debris piles and to document the change in heat flux with distance from the debris piles. The information is intended to help develop guidelines for pile spacing in cutblocks to reduce wildfire spread potential for both piles left permanently in the cutblocks and those piles waiting for winter burning.
Six piles were burned over a four-day period. The piles were composed of one
or two year old pine slash and ranged in size from 3.0 x 2.7 x 1.3 m high to
8.0 x 4.5 x 1.8 m high. Sensors in radiant cubes were used to collect heat flux
data and these were placed two, four and six metres from the piles (Figure 1).
Observations of short-range spotting and flame lengths were also made for each
pile burned.

When the largest pile was burned (8.0 x 4.5 x 1.8 m high), the fire moved into an adjacent pile 4.5 m away via short-range spotting and direct flame contact. Unfortunately, technical difficulties did not allow us to collect heat flux data. This fire scorched and killed a number of trees within 8 metres of the pile (Figure 2).
The following applies to this data:
Outcomes:
The data and visual observations show several outcomes. One, it appears the age of the debris has an influence on the heat flux generated by the piles. The one-year-old slash produced higher heat fluxes than the two year old slash even though some of the latter piles were larger. The one-year old slash retained most of the fine material with its volatile components while the two-year old slash had fewer needles and twigs as some had dried and had fallen or been broken off.
Second, at least three metres distance from a pile is required to lower the heat flux below ignition thresholds, based on the collected heat flux data for debris piles of this size.
Third, flamelengths ranged up to 10 m. These are sufficient to ignite piles
within those distances, if the flames are bent by the wind. This did occur at
Pile Two where an adjacent pile 4.5 m away was ignited by direct flame contact
and short range spotting.
A general description of Heat Flux values and what they 'mean' is presented from Alexander 19991 (taken from Drysdale 19852).
Slash is assumed to have lower ignition thresholds than processed wood due to the fines associated with the debris piles (needles/bark), which ignite more easily.
This research still requires the collection of data from debris piles consisting
of aspen and from piles that are much larger than the ones burned. This work
provides some valuable information that can be applied immediately. For example,
using measured heat flux data and observed flame lengths (which includes pile-to-pile
spread), piles should be built, at minimum, the distance of observed flame lengths
(up to10 m) apart to minimize the probability of fire spread due to direct contact
(Figure 3).

References:
1 Alexander, M.E. 1999. Interpreting and applying Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (CFFDRS) Outputs. Prepared for Unit IV-C of the National CIFFC sponsored Advanced Wildland Fire Behaviour Course.2 Drysdale, D. 1985. An introduction to fire dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England. 424 p.
3 Quintiere, J.G. 1997. Principles of Fire Behavior. Delmar Publishers, New York.
258 p.